Supreme Court Rulings

---

The United States is at a critical juncture. The transformation of the judiciary from a check and balance on power into a tool of political agendas threatens the very fabric of American democracy. The rulings of the Supreme Court and lower courts, driven by ideologically aligned judges, are laying the groundwork for an authoritarian regime where executive power is unchecked, and the rights and freedoms of individuals are systematically eroded.

1. West Virginia v. EPA (2022)
   • Ruling: The Supreme Court restricted the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) authority to regulate carbon emissions (Liptak, 2022).
   • Impact: This decision severely hampers the federal government’s ability to combat climate change, illustrating a broader strategy to weaken regulatory agencies and their power to enforce public welfare (Liptak, 2022).

1. Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022)
   • Ruling: The Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, ending nearly 50 years of federal protection for abortion rights.
   • Impact: This ruling signifies a profound shift in judicial philosophy, prioritizing ideological beliefs over established legal precedents, and undermining the Court’s role as a protector of individual rights.

1. Janus v. AFSCME (2018)
   • Ruling: The Court ruled that public sector unions cannot collect fees from non-union members.
   • Impact: This decision weakens labor unions, a traditional counterbalance to corporate power, further entrenching economic inequality and reducing the political influence of working-class Americans.

1. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee (2021)
   • Ruling: The Court upheld Arizona's restrictive voting laws, making it more difficult to challenge similar laws across the country.
   • Impact: This ruling paves the way for widespread voter suppression, disproportionately affecting minority communities and undermining the democratic process.

1. Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (2023)
   • Ruling: The Supreme Court ruled against affirmative action in college admissions.
   • Impact: This decision significantly impacts efforts to promote diversity in higher education, reversing decades of progress in educational equity and inclusion.

1. Moore v. Harper (2023)
   • Ruling: The Supreme Court rejected the "independent state legislature" theory, which would have given state legislatures near-total control over federal elections without judicial oversight.
   • Impact: While this ruling upheld judicial oversight, the dissenting opinions highlighted an ongoing threat to checks on legislative power in electoral processes.

1. California Trucking Association v. Bonta (2023)
   • Ruling: The Supreme Court limited California's ability to apply state labor laws to trucking companies, emphasizing federal preemption.
   • Impact: This decision undermines state efforts to regulate labor conditions, favoring corporate interests over worker protections.

1. National Federation of Independent Business v. OSHA (2022)
   • Ruling: The Court blocked the Biden administration's COVID-19 vaccine-or-test mandate for large employers.
   • Impact: This ruling limits federal agencies' ability to implement public health measures, weakening governmental response to health crises.

1. Texas v. United States (2024)
   • Ruling: The Supreme Court ruled that the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program is unconstitutional.
   • Impact: This decision endangers hundreds of thousands of immigrants, stripping protections from Dreamers and creating instability within immigrant communities.

1. Missouri v. Biden (2024)
   • Ruling: The Court ruled against the Biden administration’s student debt relief plan, stating it exceeded executive authority.
   • Impact: This ruling limits the executive branch's ability to address economic inequality and provides a significant setback for efforts to relieve student debt burdens.

1. United States v. Marlow (2023)
   • Ruling: The Supreme Court invalidated the federal ban on bump stocks, devices that enable semi-automatic rifles to fire more rapidly.
   • Impact: This decision favors the gun industry, undermining efforts to regulate firearms and reduce gun violence.

1. New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen (2022)
   • Ruling: The Court struck down New York’s concealed carry law, expanding the scope of the Second Amendment.
   • Impact: This decision broadens gun rights and hinders state efforts to implement stricter gun control measures.

1. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (1984)
   • Ruling: Although this case originally established the Chevron deference, which allowed federal agencies significant leeway in interpreting ambiguous statutes, recent rulings have steadily chipped away at this doctrine.
   • Impact: The erosion of Chevron deference limits the ability of federal agencies to effectively implement and enforce regulations, shifting power away from expert agencies towards the judiciary.

1. January 6th Rioters' Sentencing (2024)
   • Ruling: The Supreme Court reviewed cases related to the January 6th Capitol rioters, resulting in relatively lenient sentences for many involved.
   • Impact: These rulings have been criticized for potentially emboldening future acts of political violence and undermining the rule of law by not holding insurrectionists fully accountable.

1. Supreme Court Ruling on Criminalizing Homelessness (2024)
   • Ruling: The Supreme Court upheld laws that criminalize homelessness, allowing cities to penalize homeless individuals for sleeping in public spaces.
   • Impact: This decision has been widely condemned for exacerbating the plight of the homeless, violating human rights, and ignoring the systemic issues of poverty and housing insecurity.

1. Anti-Immigration and Anti-Asylum Rulings
   • Rulings: The Supreme Court has issued several rulings that restrict immigration and limit asylum protections.
   • Impact: These decisions have tightened immigration controls, increased deportations, and significantly reduced asylum opportunities, impacting thousands of vulnerable individuals seeking refuge in the United States.

1. Supreme Court Ruling on Presidential Immunity (2024)
   • Ruling: The Supreme Court ruled that a sitting president has absolute immunity from criminal prosecution and civil lawsuits for actions taken while in office.
   • Impact: This ruling effectively places the president above the law, significantly altering the balance of power and undermining accountability mechanisms. The dissenting justices strongly criticized this decision, arguing that it opens the door to potential abuses of power and erodes the principle that no one is above the law.

1. Clarence Thomas
   • Investigations: Justice Clarence Thomas has faced scrutiny over allegations of ethical breaches, including failing to disclose luxury trips and gifts from billionaire Harlan Crow, a major conservative donor (ProPublica, 2023).
   • Infractions: Accusations include violations of financial disclosure rules and potential conflicts of interest due to his wife, Ginni Thomas's, political activism, including her involvement in efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
   • Contributions: Clarence Thomas has not publicly reported contributions, but the ethical questions surrounding undisclosed gifts and trips raise concerns about potential undue influence on his judicial decisions (ProPublica, 2023).

1. Samuel Alito
   • Investigations: Justice Samuel Alito has also been criticized for failing to disclose luxury trips provided by conservative donors, raising ethical concerns. Following the January 6th insurrection in two distinct instances, flags associated with support for Donald Trump and used in the riots were reported to be raised outside two of Alito’s homes leading to serious questions about his impartiality on the court.
   • Infractions: Allegations include accepting undisclosed gifts from wealthy benefactors and potential conflicts of interest in cases involving major political and financial backers.
   • Contributions: Like Thomas, Alito has not reported contributions, but the undisclosed gifts have cast doubt on his impartiality in cases that affect his benefactors (ProPublica, 2023).

1. Brett Kavanaugh
   • Investigations: Justice Brett Kavanaugh faced intense scrutiny during his confirmation process, including allegations of sexual misconduct, which he denied.
   • Infractions: Ongoing concerns about his impartiality, particularly in cases involving executive power and conservative political interests.
   • Contributions: No reported contributions, but his alignment with conservative donors and groups during his confirmation raised questions about potential biases.

1. Neil Gorsuch
   • Investigations: Justice Neil Gorsuch has faced fewer publicized ethical issues compared to other justices but remains under scrutiny for his conservative rulings.
   • Infractions: Concerns about his close ties to conservative legal organizations and potential conflicts of interest.
   • Contributions: No reported contributions, though his judicial philosophy aligns closely with conservative donors' interests.

1. Amy Coney Barrett
   • Investigations: Justice Amy Coney Barrett has been scrutinized for her conservative views and potential conflicts of interest involving her affiliations with religious and conservative groups.
   • Infractions: Ethical questions about her impartiality in cases involving religious freedom and reproductive rights.
   • Contributions: No reported contributions, but her rapid confirmation process and connections to conservative groups have raised concerns.